Saturday, 27 September, 2025
London, UK
Saturday, September 27, 2025 2:24 AM
clear sky 10.3°C
Condition: Clear sky
Humidity: 84%
Wind Speed: 5.0 km/h

Former Royal Butler Says “Staff Could Be Snobs” Toward One Member of the Royal Family

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/vPdwT4qvwN7jvUP6cafkTY.png

Adjusting to life in the Royal Family as a newcomer comes with its challenges, as royal brides over the years have experienced. While Princess Diana had her own struggles while she was married to Prince Charles, she often leaned on members of palace staff for support—with a special letter the “lonely” princess wrote to one footman recently having been auctioned off. But in his new book, Diana’s former butler, Paul Burrell, revealed that palace staff treated Sarah Ferguson much differently.

Ferguson married Prince Andrew in July 1986—five years after Diana and Charles—and experienced her fair share of criticism in the press amid comparisons to Diana. It turns out that she received the same treatment within Buckingham Palace, too. In his memoir The Royal Insider (via the Mirror), Burrell wrote that “Fergie was twenty-six and like a bouncy, uncontrollable red setter puppy. She was not as popular or as well received downstairs as Diana had been.”

“Fergie may have been a breath of fresh air for the Royals but the staff preferred the gentleness of the established Princess of Wales whom they had known for almost five years,” Burrell added.

Sarah Ferguson and Prince Andrew waving from the Buckingham Palace balcony on their wedding day

Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson are seen on their 1986 wedding day.

(Image credit: Getty Images)

“Fergie was a newcomer and she had to earn the trust of the staff,” he added. “She was far too familiar for her own good, but the staff could be snobs at times.”

Describing one incident during a hunting trip, the former butler wrote, “When the men were out stalking, the ladies would meet them on the hills for a picnic lunch. A page would enquire in advance what people wanted to eat and compile a list.”

“On one occasion, Fergie sent one member of staff into a rage having failed to comply with his request,” the author continued. “In a voice heard by all the ladies assembled, including the Queen, he boomed, ‘What does that red-haired mare want for lunch?’”

Sarah Ferguson and Princess Diana wearing ski suits

Princess Diana and Sarah Ferguson are seen skiing in 1988.

(Image credit: Getty Images)

Burrell wrote that none of the royals spoke up or corrected the staff member. “It was accepted with silence as if it was never said,” he continued. “No reprimand. The staff had formed their opinion based on gossip and her behaviour.”

The Duchess of York has been in the news once again after a 2011 email she wrote to “supreme friend” Jeffrey Epstein was leaked on September 20. According to one royal insider, The King and Prince William disagree on how to handle Ferguson and Prince Andrew, who was forced to step down from royal duties after his association with the late convicted sex offender.

“William feels even more strongly than The King that Andrew and Fergie are an embarrassment and will be urging his father to act,” a source told the Daily Mail. However, “The King doesn’t want to cut ties with his brother, former sister-in-law and that side of the family.”

LP Staff Writers

Writers at Lord’s Press come from a range of professional backgrounds, including history, diplomacy, heraldry, and public administration. Many publish anonymously or under initials—a practice that reflects the publication’s long-standing emphasis on discretion and editorial objectivity. While they bring expertise in European nobility, protocol, and archival research, their role is not to opine, but to document. Their focus remains on accuracy, historical integrity, and the preservation of events and individuals whose significance might otherwise go unrecorded.

Categories

Follow

    Newsletter

    Subscribe to receive your complimentary login credentials and unlock full access to all features and stories from Lord’s Press.

    As a journal of record, Lord’s Press remains freely accessible—thanks to the enduring support of our distinguished partners and patrons. Subscribing ensures uninterrupted access to our archives, special reports, and exclusive notices.

    LP is free thanks to our Sponsors

    Privacy Overview

    Privacy & Cookie Notice

    This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to help us understand how our content is accessed and used. Cookies are small text files stored in your browser that allow us to recognise your device upon return, retain your preferences, and gather anonymised usage statistics to improve site performance.

    Under EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we process this data based on your consent. You will be prompted to accept or customise your cookie preferences when you first visit our site.

    You may adjust or withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie settings link in the website footer. For more information on how we handle your data, please refer to our full Privacy Policy