Sunday, 26 October, 2025
London, UK
Sunday, October 26, 2025 4:20 PM
light rain 10.0°C
Condition: Light rain
Humidity: 71%
Wind Speed: 24.1 km/h

Rachel Reeves set to wage war on middle class with ‘dangerous’ new tax – Could you be impacted?

Rachel Reeves is said to be moving to introduce a “dangerous” new tax on middle-class Britons.

The Chancellor, who just days ago was reported to be targeting doctors, lawyers and accountants, is now set to slap landlords with a mansion tax.

Under the proposals, the owners of properties worth £2million and above would face a charge of one per cent of the amount by which the property exceeds that value.

This means owners of a £3million property would face a bill of £10,000 every year.

According to estate agent Savills, an estimated 142,500 properties in the UK were worth £2million or more by the end of June 2025.

Property experts have condemned the policy as a “blunt and crude instrument” which would harm the housing market and damage older households.

The Tories criticised the plan, deeming it counter-productive and class-based.

The mansion tax raid is part of Ms Reeves’ plan to target the rich in her upcoming Budget, which looks set to include a hike in income tax and the removal of pensioners’ tax-free allowances.

u200bProperty experts have condemned the policy as a 'blunt and crude instrument'

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Treasury Minister Torsten Bell is helping lead the preparations, having previously worked as Ed Miliband’s director of policy when he was party leader.

Under the plan, homes worth between £2million and £3million will pay £3,000 a year in additional taxes, as owners of homes worth tens of millions and second home owners will pay much higher rates.

Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride said: “Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves promised not to raise taxes, now we know they are planning to do just that.

“If Starmer and Reeves introduce a so-called mansion tax, they will be punishing aspiration and hitting hard-working people. This isn’t fairness, it’s class war.”

Homes worth between u00a32million and u00a33million would have paid u00a33,000 a year in additional taxesu200b

Mr Stride continued: “If Rachel Reeves had a backbone, she’d get a grip of spending, including the welfare bill, instead of raising taxes again and chasing out the very wealth creators our economy depends on.

“Under Labour, nothing is safe, not your job, your home, your savings or your pension. Rachel Reeves will tax your children’s future to pay for her failure.”

Should plans go ahead with a mansion tax, a difficult bureaucratic property revaluation will be required, with current council tax bands based on property values as of April 1991.

Until last year, Mr Bell had proposed a reform of property taxation in the UK, floating the idea of scrapping council tax and replacing it with a flat charge of 0.5 per cent of a property’s value every year.

The move is part of Ms Reeves' plan to target the rich in her upcoming budgetu200b

The foundation also suggested scrapping the current inheritance tax system and replacing it with a new one that levies tax on individual heirs, not estates, with a lifetime tax-free allowance of £125,000, a basic rate of 20 per cent tax on inherited income up to £500,000 and a 30 per cent tax on income of more than £500,000.

Head of residential research at Savills, Lucian Cook, said a mansion tax was a “very blunt and crude instrument” that was unlikely to truly target the wealthy.

He said: “There’s a big difference between someone in a £2million house without a mortgage and someone with a sizeable mortgage. So it doesn’t necessarily capture net wealth at all.”

Mr Cook noted that it was “very difficult to get accurate valuations” of properties worth over £2million, as such houses are usually “quite specific properties, so administering this tax is going to be expensive because any valuation is likely to be contested”.

Our Standards:
The GB News Editorial Charter


LP Staff Writers

Writers at Lord’s Press come from a range of professional backgrounds, including history, diplomacy, heraldry, and public administration. Many publish anonymously or under initials—a practice that reflects the publication’s long-standing emphasis on discretion and editorial objectivity. While they bring expertise in European nobility, protocol, and archival research, their role is not to opine, but to document. Their focus remains on accuracy, historical integrity, and the preservation of events and individuals whose significance might otherwise go unrecorded.

Categories

Follow

    Newsletter

    Subscribe to receive your complimentary login credentials and unlock full access to all features and stories from Lord’s Press.

    As a journal of record, Lord’s Press remains freely accessible—thanks to the enduring support of our distinguished partners and patrons. Subscribing ensures uninterrupted access to our archives, special reports, and exclusive notices.

    LP is free thanks to our Sponsors

    Privacy Overview

    Privacy & Cookie Notice

    This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to help us understand how our content is accessed and used. Cookies are small text files stored in your browser that allow us to recognise your device upon return, retain your preferences, and gather anonymised usage statistics to improve site performance.

    Under EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we process this data based on your consent. You will be prompted to accept or customise your cookie preferences when you first visit our site.

    You may adjust or withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie settings link in the website footer. For more information on how we handle your data, please refer to our full Privacy Policy