Monday, 10 November, 2025
London, UK
Monday, November 10, 2025 9:48 PM
clear sky 9.9°C
Condition: Clear sky
Humidity: 92%
Wind Speed: 13.0 km/h

 US Supreme Court declines case seeking to overturn same-sex marriage ruling

The Supreme Court has turned down a bid to have the justices revisit the court’s landmark decision a decade ago that guaranteed the right to same-sex marriage nationwide.

The high court on Monday turned down a petition from Kim Davis, a former county clerk in Kentucky who objected on religious grounds to issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Davis urged the court to use a lawsuit against her as a vehicle to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 ruling that legalized same-sex marriage in all states.

No justice noted any dissent or released any opinion as the court rejected Davis’ case in a routine order list.

Obergefell was issued on a 5-4 vote, with conservative Justice Anthony Kennedy joining the liberals to establish the same-sex marriage right. With Kennedy’s retirement in 2018 and President Donald Trump’s appointees later shoring up a 6-3 conservative majority, Davis’ lawyers hoped to muster the four justices needed to get the court to take up the issue again. But Davis’ petition, which appeared to many court watchers as a long-shot bid, fell short.

One member of the court, Justice Clarence Thomas, has called for the court to revisit Obergefell.

In 2022, when the Supreme Court ended the federal constitutional right to abortion, Thomas urged his colleagues in a concurring opinion to “reconsider” the same-sex marriage ruling. However, writing at the time for the court’s majority, Justice Samuel Alito insisted that “nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.”

LP Staff Writers

Writers at Lord’s Press come from a range of professional backgrounds, including history, diplomacy, heraldry, and public administration. Many publish anonymously or under initials—a practice that reflects the publication’s long-standing emphasis on discretion and editorial objectivity. While they bring expertise in European nobility, protocol, and archival research, their role is not to opine, but to document. Their focus remains on accuracy, historical integrity, and the preservation of events and individuals whose significance might otherwise go unrecorded.

Categories

Follow

    Newsletter

    Subscribe to receive your complimentary login credentials and unlock full access to all features and stories from Lord’s Press.

    As a journal of record, Lord’s Press remains freely accessible—thanks to the enduring support of our distinguished partners and patrons. Subscribing ensures uninterrupted access to our archives, special reports, and exclusive notices.

    LP is free thanks to our Sponsors

    Privacy Overview

    Privacy & Cookie Notice

    This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to help us understand how our content is accessed and used. Cookies are small text files stored in your browser that allow us to recognise your device upon return, retain your preferences, and gather anonymised usage statistics to improve site performance.

    Under EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we process this data based on your consent. You will be prompted to accept or customise your cookie preferences when you first visit our site.

    You may adjust or withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie settings link in the website footer. For more information on how we handle your data, please refer to our full Privacy Policy