Thursday, 22 January, 2026
London, UK
Thursday, January 22, 2026 7:57 PM
broken clouds 8.8°C
Condition: Broken clouds
Humidity: 90%
Wind Speed: 14.8 km/h

Rachel Reeves backs major tax hikes on online gambling following pressure from MPs

Labour has signed off on major online gambling tax increases, adopting the Treasury Committee’s recommendations from last autumn as part of the Chancellor’s latest Budget.

Dame Meg Hillier, who chairs the committee, welcomed the decision, and said it marked an important shift in how the state approaches the taxation of digital betting.

She said: “The decision by the Chancellor to use her Budget to increase taxes on online gambling is a victory for common sense.

“The Chancellor has made the right decision in agreeing with my Committee that the tax rate for remote betting, including highly addictive casino games, should reflect the harm it inflicts.”

Ministers expect the new measures to raise more than £1billion a year for the public purse once fully implemented.

The announcement follows the Treasury Committee’s rejection of claims made by the gambling industry that online betting does not create harmful social consequences.

Under the new regime, remote gaming duty will almost double, increasing from 21 per cent to 40 per cent when the changes come into force on April 1, 2026.

Remote betting will also face a significant rise, with the duty rate set to increase from 15 per cent to 25 per cent from April 1, 2027.

The Government has decided to exempt traditional forms of gambling from the new tax increases.

Bets placed on UK horse racing will not be affected by the reforms and in-person gambling activities will be shielded from higher duties.

Rachel Reeves

Bingo halls are set to benefit from the changes, with bingo duty being abolished entirely from April 2026.

The Treasury said the package formed part of a wider effort to create what it described as a fair, modern and sustainable tax system.

The committee first set out the case for reform in a report published on November 7, 2025.

In that report, the cross-party MPs urged ministers to resist what they described as scaremongering from parts of the gambling industry.

The committee concluded gambling tax rates should be aligned with the level of harm caused by different activities.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Online gambling

It rejected the sector’s assertion that its online products generate no negative social impact.

At the time, Dame Hillier criticised those claims in strong terms and questioned the credibility of the industry’s position.

“I find it staggering that the industry can make the boldfaced claim that its activities do not cause harm”.

She said online platforms were “extracting huge amounts of money from people who have been funnelled into the most addictive, harmful corners of the industry via their love of sports, or the occasional game of bingo”.

The committee argued online gambling has expanded rapidly over the past decade and now accounts for a far larger share of the market.

Its analysis showed remote gaming’s share of Gross Gambling Yield rose from 12 per cent in 2013/14 to 44 per cent in 2023/24.

MPs linked that growth to the rise of high-frequency and highly addictive gambling products available through smartphones and other digital devices.

They said such products offered little benefit to individuals, families or communities while posing a heightened risk of harm.

Tax burden graph

The committee also stressed that many people in Britain gamble responsibly.

It pointed to activities such as visits to seaside arcades, local racecourses and bingo halls as examples of traditional gambling pursued without significant harm.

However, MPs warned the industry often uses those activities to obscure the more damaging aspects of online betting.

The Government said its response reflects that distinction by protecting horse racing and in-person gambling while placing higher taxes on digital operators.

Our Standards:
The GB News Editorial Charter

LP Staff Writers

Writers at Lord’s Press come from a range of professional backgrounds, including history, diplomacy, heraldry, and public administration. Many publish anonymously or under initials—a practice that reflects the publication’s long-standing emphasis on discretion and editorial objectivity. While they bring expertise in European nobility, protocol, and archival research, their role is not to opine, but to document. Their focus remains on accuracy, historical integrity, and the preservation of events and individuals whose significance might otherwise go unrecorded.

Categories

Follow

    Newsletter

    Subscribe to receive your complimentary login credentials and unlock full access to all features and stories from Lord’s Press.

    As a journal of record, Lord’s Press remains freely accessible—thanks to the enduring support of our distinguished partners and patrons. Subscribing ensures uninterrupted access to our archives, special reports, and exclusive notices.

    LP is free thanks to our Sponsors

    Privacy Overview

    Privacy & Cookie Notice

    This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to help us understand how our content is accessed and used. Cookies are small text files stored in your browser that allow us to recognise your device upon return, retain your preferences, and gather anonymised usage statistics to improve site performance.

    Under EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we process this data based on your consent. You will be prompted to accept or customise your cookie preferences when you first visit our site.

    You may adjust or withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie settings link in the website footer. For more information on how we handle your data, please refer to our full Privacy Policy