Saturday, 24 January, 2026
London, UK
Saturday, January 24, 2026 6:15 PM
broken clouds 7.1°C
Condition: Broken clouds
Humidity: 82%
Wind Speed: 27.8 km/h

‘Kill the bill!’ Keir Starmer could face ANOTHER Chagos headache as campaigners eye up second court challenge

Sir Keir Starmer could be in for an another headache over his Chagos deal after campaigners have started to eye up a second court challenge.

Joining GB News, the Chagossian Trust’s Jean-Francois Nellan discussed the different avenues Chagossians could take to block the bill in the hope of squashing the deal for good.

On Friday night, Sir Keir was forced to withdraw his Chagos Island Bill after retaliation plagued Downing Street from across the Atlantic last week.

The move followed President Trump sending heads spinning in No10 by dubbing the deal “an act of great stupidity”, questioning the rationale behind the UK’s decision.

Keir Starmer; Chagossian Trust's Jean-Francois Nellan

The legislation had been scheduled for debate in the House of Lords on Monday but the scrutiny of the controversial bill is no longer going ahead.

While he expressed relief at the postponement, Mr Nellan said the Chagossians had to think of action which could stop the deal in its tracks once and for all.

Consequently, he flirted with the idea of bringing forward another court challenge over concerns the bilateral agreement between the UK and Mauritius could violate Chagossians’ rights.

The threat has followed a report, published back in December, from the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), which issued a warning to the UK Government.

On GB News, the campaigner said if the UK fails to respect their rights, as outlined by the UN, the Chagossians could return to the international body’s recommendation.

He added: “We still have the case, which happened in October when the judge said they were going to give the ruling two weeks after the hearing, but now it’s come to nearly the end of January.

“We’re still waiting to hear it from from the High Court.

“But we still we are working with other authorities as well to bring the other case against the UK Government.”

The UN’s recommendation was “alarmed” Mauritius would lease Diego Garcia back to the UK for 99 years with the possibility of a 40-year extension.

LATEST ON THE CHAGOS:

Donald Trump

The Committee warned the deal “explicitly prevents the return of the Chagossian people to their ancestral lands in Diego Garcia Island”.

Additionally, the group stressed the deal could stop Chagossians “from exercising their cultural rights and preserving their cultural heritage”.

But the committee also flagged the deal excluded any meaningful participation of Chagossians, “affecting their rights and lands” and “restricting the exercise of their right to self-determination”.

Labour has particularly come under fire for allowing the deal to go ahead without the green light from the Chagossians, many of whom have long-campaigned for the British sovereignty over the territory.

Last week, GB News’ Camilla Tominey grilled Labour Minister Lisa Nandy after the Prime Minister claimed the fate of Greenland should be determined by the nation’s people.

However, the same train of thought has not applied to the Chagos Islands and its residents.

Nevertheless, campaigners have refused to accept the move from No10, persistently campaigning and speaking out against the agreement with a current court case from October chugging on.

Last year, three Chagossians asked for the go-ahead from the High Court to pursue a legal challenge against Labour for failures to “adequately and lawfully consult with the Chagossian people” on their interests.

The Chagossian first minister Louis Misley Mandarin told The Independent he remains hopeful for the outcome of the legal challenge, which will be published before the end of the month.

Our Standards:
The GB News Editorial Charter

LP Staff Writers

Writers at Lord’s Press come from a range of professional backgrounds, including history, diplomacy, heraldry, and public administration. Many publish anonymously or under initials—a practice that reflects the publication’s long-standing emphasis on discretion and editorial objectivity. While they bring expertise in European nobility, protocol, and archival research, their role is not to opine, but to document. Their focus remains on accuracy, historical integrity, and the preservation of events and individuals whose significance might otherwise go unrecorded.

Categories

Follow

    Newsletter

    Subscribe to receive your complimentary login credentials and unlock full access to all features and stories from Lord’s Press.

    As a journal of record, Lord’s Press remains freely accessible—thanks to the enduring support of our distinguished partners and patrons. Subscribing ensures uninterrupted access to our archives, special reports, and exclusive notices.

    LP is free thanks to our Sponsors

    Privacy Overview

    Privacy & Cookie Notice

    This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to help us understand how our content is accessed and used. Cookies are small text files stored in your browser that allow us to recognise your device upon return, retain your preferences, and gather anonymised usage statistics to improve site performance.

    Under EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we process this data based on your consent. You will be prompted to accept or customise your cookie preferences when you first visit our site.

    You may adjust or withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie settings link in the website footer. For more information on how we handle your data, please refer to our full Privacy Policy