Thursday, 12 February, 2026
London, UK
Thursday, February 12, 2026 3:27 PM
moderate rain 9.7°C
Condition: Moderate rain
Humidity: 90%
Wind Speed: 9.3 km/h

The British Public Is Divided on How the Royal Family Has Handled Andrew Allegations, Polls Show

https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod/images/30f7e501-d695-44ef-800f-4356fda88397.jpeg?crop=1xw:0.669670442842xh;center,top&resize=1200:*

“Should the King say sorry?” was the subject of one discussion. “Does the King need to apologize to Epstein’s victims?” was another. This is just a flavor of the ongoing debate surrounding the royal family in the UK since the latest release of the Epstein Files has thrown up more allegations against the former Prince Andrew.

In recent days, the royals have faced unprecedented heckling on official engagements and also released unprecedented statements. Prince William and Kate made their first public comment in relation to Epstein via Kensington Palace on Monday, and on the same day Buckingham Palace released a statement saying they “stand ready to support” Police as they assess claims over Andrew.

The King has already taken away all his brother’s titles and severed his ties to the monarchy, but his links to Epstein continues to dominate the narrative. And new polling has indicated that the British public is divided about how the royals have handled, and should continue to handle, the scandal.

Party At Mar-A-Lago

Davidoff Studios Photography//Getty Images

Melania Trump, Prince Andrew, Gwendolyn Beck and Jeffrey Epstein at a party at the Mar-a-Lago club, Palm Beach, Florida, February 12, 2000.

One survey by YouGov of 7,000 British adults found that 51% of people think the royal family should have done more to condemn Prince Andrew. But the study, carried out on February 9 this year, showed that 32% think they have mostly taken the right approach.

A different survey of more than 2,200 British adults, carried out by YouGov for Sky News, has also painted a picture of the British public being split on the King’s response. When asked, “How well or badly do you think King Charles has responded to allegations about the former Prince Andrew and his connections to Jeffrey Epstein?” 45% in total thought he had responded well while 29% felt he had responded badly.

And when it comes how the royals should handle things now, there are also differing views. The survey for Sky asked “Do you think the King should or should not make an apology to Jeffrey Epstein’s victims on behalf of the Royal Family?” To this, 35% said he should, 45% said he should not, and the rest said they don’t know.

The Funeral Of The Duchess Of Kent

Max Mumby/Indigo//Getty Images

Andrew, King Charles, and Prince William in September 2025.

Public opinion is more united, however, on the question of whether the King should encourage Andrew to give evidence to American police, with 82% answering he should. And a significant majority of 63% thought that the King should stop Andrew living on the Sandringham estate versus just 16% who thought he should not stop him.

The release of the Epstein Files has sparked huge debate around Andrew after the extent of his relationship with Epstein was revealed through multiple documents. The files show that he maintained contact with Epstein beyond 2010—the date he told Newsnight he had severed ties.

Police have said they are assessing allegations of misconduct in public office in relation to Andrew. Documents in the Epstein Files showed that the then Prince forwarded information to Epstein that he received in his role as UK Trade Envoy.

Andrew has always denied any wrongdoing.

Headshot of Victoria Murphy

Town & Country Contributing Editor Victoria Murphy has reported on the British Royal Family since 2010. She has interviewed Prince Harry and has travelled the world covering several royal tours. She is a frequent contributor to Good Morning America. Victoria authored Town & Country book The Queen: A Life in Pictures, released in 2021. 

LP Staff Writers

Writers at Lord’s Press come from a range of professional backgrounds, including history, diplomacy, heraldry, and public administration. Many publish anonymously or under initials—a practice that reflects the publication’s long-standing emphasis on discretion and editorial objectivity. While they bring expertise in European nobility, protocol, and archival research, their role is not to opine, but to document. Their focus remains on accuracy, historical integrity, and the preservation of events and individuals whose significance might otherwise go unrecorded.

Categories

Follow

    Newsletter

    Subscribe to receive your complimentary login credentials and unlock full access to all features and stories from Lord’s Press.

    As a journal of record, Lord’s Press remains freely accessible—thanks to the enduring support of our distinguished partners and patrons. Subscribing ensures uninterrupted access to our archives, special reports, and exclusive notices.

    LP is free thanks to our Sponsors

    Privacy Overview

    Privacy & Cookie Notice

    This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to help us understand how our content is accessed and used. Cookies are small text files stored in your browser that allow us to recognise your device upon return, retain your preferences, and gather anonymised usage statistics to improve site performance.

    Under EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we process this data based on your consent. You will be prompted to accept or customise your cookie preferences when you first visit our site.

    You may adjust or withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie settings link in the website footer. For more information on how we handle your data, please refer to our full Privacy Policy