Friday, 13 February, 2026
London, UK
Friday, February 13, 2026 10:17 PM
broken clouds 4.4°C
Condition: Broken clouds
Humidity: 80%
Wind Speed: 24.1 km/h

Ukrainian skeleton racer fails to overturn Olympics ban at top court

The Court of Arbitration for Sport on Friday rejected an appeal by Ukrainian skeleton racer Vladyslav Heraskevych against his disqualification from the Olympics.

The International Olympic Committee on Thursday blocked Heraskevych from performing at the Games for refusing to change his helmet, which depicted 22 Ukrainian athletes that Russia has killed during its war on Ukraine. The IOC said the helmet violated its guidelines on political messaging during the Games.

Heraskevych said his memorial act was not political and denied violating any rules. The IOC returned his accreditation to the Olympics, which are being held in Northern Italy, but still banned him from performing, despite a wave of support for Heraskevych from senior figures, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

However, after an appeal, CAS backed the IOC, saying that although it was fully sympathetic to Heraskevych’s decision to commemorate his compatriots, the focus must be on the Olympic Games and other athletes.

Heraskevych said his helmet displayed only portraits and no political slogans, and that he was disqualified before the race, so he did not violate any rules.

“The court sided with the IOC and upheld a decision that an athlete could be disqualified from the Olympic Games without actual misconduct, without a technical or safety threat, and before the start,” Pronin Law Firm, representing Heraskevych, said in a statement after the decision.

“This case was much broader than an individual dispute. It concerned the freedom of expression of athletes, the limits of discretion of sports bodies, and the very understanding of Olympic values,” the firm added.

LP Staff Writers

Writers at Lord’s Press come from a range of professional backgrounds, including history, diplomacy, heraldry, and public administration. Many publish anonymously or under initials—a practice that reflects the publication’s long-standing emphasis on discretion and editorial objectivity. While they bring expertise in European nobility, protocol, and archival research, their role is not to opine, but to document. Their focus remains on accuracy, historical integrity, and the preservation of events and individuals whose significance might otherwise go unrecorded.

Categories

Follow

    Newsletter

    Subscribe to receive your complimentary login credentials and unlock full access to all features and stories from Lord’s Press.

    As a journal of record, Lord’s Press remains freely accessible—thanks to the enduring support of our distinguished partners and patrons. Subscribing ensures uninterrupted access to our archives, special reports, and exclusive notices.

    LP is free thanks to our Sponsors

    Privacy Overview

    Privacy & Cookie Notice

    This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to help us understand how our content is accessed and used. Cookies are small text files stored in your browser that allow us to recognise your device upon return, retain your preferences, and gather anonymised usage statistics to improve site performance.

    Under EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we process this data based on your consent. You will be prompted to accept or customise your cookie preferences when you first visit our site.

    You may adjust or withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie settings link in the website footer. For more information on how we handle your data, please refer to our full Privacy Policy