Sunday, 11 January, 2026
London, UK
Sunday, January 11, 2026 10:20 PM
light rain 8.4°C
Condition: Light rain
Humidity: 93%
Wind Speed: 27.8 km/h

Donald Trump ally questions UK censorship amid Labour cousin marriage row after GB News exclusive

A key ally of Donald Trump has blasted Labour in the ongoing row over the party’s stance on cousin marriage.

Sarah Rogers also compared the Government’s threats against Elon Musk social media platform X to Vladimir Putin’s Russia as she took aim at Sir Keir Starmer’s party.

This week, in a GB News exclusive, Sir Keir Starmer’s party were accused of backing cousin marriage by refusing to support a Private Members’ Bill seeking to ban the “medieval” practice.

Now, Ms Rogers, under-secretary for public diplomacy at the US State Department, has questioned UK censorship.

Shadow Minister Richard Holden had pressed the Prime Minister in the Commons after a scheduled second reading vote due to be held this week was stalled.

Mr Holden had asked Sir Keir to “think again” to allow the legislation to go in front of the House.

The Prime Minister responded saying “We’ve taken our position on that bill.”

Ms Rogers has waded into the row where she shared screenshots from Wikipedia highlighting the impact of cousin marriage and its connection to honour killing.

u200bu200bSarah Rogers

Responding to the video of Mr Holden and Sir Keir in the Commons, Ms Rogers said: “I’ve received some questions about what we mean, in our National Security Strategy, when we invoke ‘civilisational’ concerns.

“[Labour is] contemplating a Russia-style X ban, to protect them from bikini images.”

Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said the Government would back regulator Ofcom if it decided to implement a ban on accessing X from the UK over its artificial intelligence Grok being used to create deepfake images.

Tech tycoon Elon Musk, the boss of Grok’s creator xAI and the X social media platform where images have been shared, has accused the UK Government of being “fascist” and trying to curb free speech after ministers stepped up threats to effectively block his website.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

David Lammy with Vice President JD Vance

Ofcom has been in contact with X and xAI over the production of images of undressed people and sexualised images of children and is carrying out an “expedited assessment” of the firms’ response.

Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy claimed US Vice President JD Vance was sympathetic to efforts to tackle the Grok-produced images.

Mr Lammy, who met Mr Vance in the US this week told The Guardian he raised the issue of Grok “and the horrendous, horrific situation in which this new technology is allowing deepfakes and the manipulation of images of women and children, which is just absolutely abhorrent”.

He said: “[Mr Vance] agreed with me that it was entirely unacceptable.”

Grok

Mr Lammy continued: “I think [Mr Vance] recognised the very seriousness with which images of women and children could be manipulated in this way, and he recognised how despicable, unacceptable, that is and I found him sympathetic to that position.”

Meanwhile, Mr Musk claimed the Government “want any excuse for censorship” and “just want to suppress free speech.”

Responding to a chart showing arrest figures for online posts with the UK at the top, Mr Musk said: “Why is the UK Government so fascist?”

Meanwhile Ms Kendall said Labour was drawing “an unbreakable line in the sand”, adding that “profiting from abuse will never be acceptable.”

Liz Kendall

Writing in The Sunday Telegraph, she said: “Innovation must serve humanity, not degrade it. If companies choose greed over responsibility, they will face the full force of the law.”

She said the Online Safety Act includes the power for courts to block services from being accessed in the United Kingdom if they refuse to comply with UK law.

“These powers exist for a reason. If we reach a point where Ofcom decides to use them, they will have the full support of this Government,” she said.

LP Staff Writers

Writers at Lord’s Press come from a range of professional backgrounds, including history, diplomacy, heraldry, and public administration. Many publish anonymously or under initials—a practice that reflects the publication’s long-standing emphasis on discretion and editorial objectivity. While they bring expertise in European nobility, protocol, and archival research, their role is not to opine, but to document. Their focus remains on accuracy, historical integrity, and the preservation of events and individuals whose significance might otherwise go unrecorded.

Categories

Follow

    Newsletter

    Subscribe to receive your complimentary login credentials and unlock full access to all features and stories from Lord’s Press.

    As a journal of record, Lord’s Press remains freely accessible—thanks to the enduring support of our distinguished partners and patrons. Subscribing ensures uninterrupted access to our archives, special reports, and exclusive notices.

    LP is free thanks to our Sponsors

    Privacy Overview

    Privacy & Cookie Notice

    This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to help us understand how our content is accessed and used. Cookies are small text files stored in your browser that allow us to recognise your device upon return, retain your preferences, and gather anonymised usage statistics to improve site performance.

    Under EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we process this data based on your consent. You will be prompted to accept or customise your cookie preferences when you first visit our site.

    You may adjust or withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie settings link in the website footer. For more information on how we handle your data, please refer to our full Privacy Policy