Thursday, 06 November, 2025
London, UK
Thursday, November 6, 2025 10:19 PM
broken clouds 14.7°C
Condition: Broken clouds
Humidity: 89%
Wind Speed: 7.4 km/h

‘Farcical, ridiculous, DANGEROUS!’ Martin Daubney ‘astonished’ by mistaken prison releases as David Lammy slapped with damning verdict

GB News star Martin Daubney has been left astonished after David Lammy defended his decision not to inform MPs about the mistaken release of an Algerian sex offender.

The People’s Channel’s political correspondent Katherine Forster delivered an equally damning verdict on the Justice Secretary’s first-ever Prime Minister’s Questions performance as pressure mounts on the Deputy Prime Minister.

Earlier today, Mr Lammy, who was standing in for Sir Keir Starmer at Prime Minister’s Questions yesterday, said he was “right” not to provide details to MPs of the accidental release of Ibrahim Kaddour-Cherif.

In his first public appearance since the news broke on Wednesday of two accidental releases from HMP Wandsworth, Mr Lammy said: “I first found out about this on Wednesday morning, I was in the department both learning from officials but also preparing for Prime Minister’s Questions.

“At the despatch box, I did not have all of the detail, that detail was actually released just later after I had finished at Prime Minister’s Questions.

“I took the judgement that it is important when updating the House and the country about serious matters like this that you have all of the detail.

“I was not equipped with all of the detail and the danger is you that end up misleading the House and the general public. So that is the judgement I took. I think it’s the right judgement.”

Speaking to Katherine live on air, Martin raged against Mr Lammy: “You and I were in astonishment in the studio together yesterday as this farcical, ridiculous, dangerous scene unravelled before our eyes.”

David Lammy; Martin Daubney

“Still a lot of questions need to be asked,” Martin adamantly demanded.

Mr Lammy is understood to have had a statement prepared to deliver from the despatch box upon the breaking of the box, but decided against it, allies have indicated.

“But figures have come out overnight that mistaken releases have simply skyrocketed under the Labour regime. When will this Government take accountability for what is happening on its watch?” Martin exclaimed.

Reiterating the statement, Katherine revealed that accidental releases have “more than doubled under Labour”, although the “seeds of this crisis were laid long ago”.

LABOUR LATEST:

The correspondent mentioned a number of factors, including “huge” cuts to prison budgets and a rising number of inexperienced staff over the years.

“It’s very curious because yesterday we sat here and we were led to believe that he’d known the night before,” Katherine said.

“I still think it’s very problematic for David Lammy. First of all, he was exceedingly angry. He was really, really, really cross.

“James Cartlidge was more than entitled to ask those questions. David Lammy did not react well, and also he did know he might not have known if the guy was an asylum seeker.

Katherine Forster

In the Commons, the Shadow Defence Secretary asked his Labour counterpart five times whether he knew an asylum-seeking prisoner had been accidentally released since Ethiopian sex offender was freed from HMP Chelmsford in error last month.

Katherine continued: “He might not have had the details, but we know that he had a statement ready to go. I’m still absolutely mystified as to why he didn’t get ahead of it, knowing that it was going to break and begin before PMQs got underway.”

She added: “I think there’s a lot of unhappiness in the Labour Party, right up to very senior levels about his outing in PMQs yesterday.

Weighing in, Martin declared: “I think the situation really still is as clear as mud. I really, really do.”

Our Standards:
The GB News Editorial Charter

LP Staff Writers

Writers at Lord’s Press come from a range of professional backgrounds, including history, diplomacy, heraldry, and public administration. Many publish anonymously or under initials—a practice that reflects the publication’s long-standing emphasis on discretion and editorial objectivity. While they bring expertise in European nobility, protocol, and archival research, their role is not to opine, but to document. Their focus remains on accuracy, historical integrity, and the preservation of events and individuals whose significance might otherwise go unrecorded.

Categories

Follow

    Newsletter

    Subscribe to receive your complimentary login credentials and unlock full access to all features and stories from Lord’s Press.

    As a journal of record, Lord’s Press remains freely accessible—thanks to the enduring support of our distinguished partners and patrons. Subscribing ensures uninterrupted access to our archives, special reports, and exclusive notices.

    LP is free thanks to our Sponsors

    Privacy Overview

    Privacy & Cookie Notice

    This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to help us understand how our content is accessed and used. Cookies are small text files stored in your browser that allow us to recognise your device upon return, retain your preferences, and gather anonymised usage statistics to improve site performance.

    Under EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we process this data based on your consent. You will be prompted to accept or customise your cookie preferences when you first visit our site.

    You may adjust or withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie settings link in the website footer. For more information on how we handle your data, please refer to our full Privacy Policy