Thursday, 25 September, 2025
London, UK
Thursday, September 25, 2025 8:09 PM
clear sky 12.1°C
Condition: Clear sky
Humidity: 59%
Wind Speed: 13.0 km/h

‘How DARE you’: Michelle Dewberry rages at digital ID plan as she brands it an attempt to ‘control’ Britons

A fierce clash erupted on GB News over the Government’s proposed digital identification system, with presenter Michelle Dewberry and commentator Scarlett Mccgwire taking opposing stances on the controversial scheme.

The debate followed Sir Keir Starmer’s expected announcement of the “Brit-card” initiative, designed to address unauthorised employment and reduce Britain’s appeal to those working illegally.

Michelle Dewberry

The digital identification proposal would require individuals to present smartphone-based verification when seeking employment or accommodation, with automatic checks against a Government database confirming work eligibility.

The heated exchange highlighted fundamental disagreements about balancing immigration control with personal freedoms, as the presenters sparred over whether mandatory digital identification represents necessary modernisation or excessive state intrusion into citizens’ lives.

GB News panel

Michelle launched a scathing attack on the proposal, condemning it as Governmental failure disguised as policy reform.

“When you start mandating to people that this is what you have to do… Remember during Covid, they tried to control you within an inch of your life,” she declared during Dewbs & Co.

She referenced Sweden’s experience with similar systems, arguing that digital identification had failed to resolve migration challenges in that country.

Her criticism intensified as she addressed what she perceived as governmental incompetence. “I think it is an absolute disgrace. How dare you. How dare you, because you are so poor at your job when it comes to managing migration, that we’ve already got to deal with our communities changing beyond recognition, how dare you because of your own inability, force even more consequence onto law abiding British people.”

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Ms Mccgwire defended the initiative during the broadcast, characterising digital identification as an intelligent measure for addressing unauthorised employment.

The commentator’s position directly contradicted Michelle’s assessment, as she argued the system would effectively target those working without proper authorisation in Britain.

Keir Starmer

The proposed scheme would function through a smartphone application, requiring job seekers and prospective tenants to display their digital credentials for verification against a central registry of individuals permitted to work within the UK.

Current procedures rely on physical documentation that authorities fear can be counterfeited, whilst some employers allegedly bypass verification requirements entirely.

The system aims to eliminate Britain’s attractiveness to those seeking unauthorised employment, particularly within sectors such as delivery services, by establishing mandatory electronic verification processes.

Britain stands among the minority of European nations lacking a national identification system, a situation critics argue has enabled unauthorised employment to thrive and increased the country’s appeal to those working illegally.

The previous Labour administration attempted implementation of identification cards, issuing the first in 2009, before the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition abolished the programme, citing concerns about civil liberty erosion.

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has expressed strong backing for digital identification, stating her “long-term personal political view has always been in favour of ID cards” and emphasising the need to address factors making Britain “a destination of choice” for global migration.

The Prime Minister’s announcement is anticipated for Friday at the Global Progress Action Summit in London, where he will appear alongside Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney.

LP Staff Writers

Writers at Lord’s Press come from a range of professional backgrounds, including history, diplomacy, heraldry, and public administration. Many publish anonymously or under initials—a practice that reflects the publication’s long-standing emphasis on discretion and editorial objectivity. While they bring expertise in European nobility, protocol, and archival research, their role is not to opine, but to document. Their focus remains on accuracy, historical integrity, and the preservation of events and individuals whose significance might otherwise go unrecorded.

Categories

Follow

    Newsletter

    Subscribe to receive your complimentary login credentials and unlock full access to all features and stories from Lord’s Press.

    As a journal of record, Lord’s Press remains freely accessible—thanks to the enduring support of our distinguished partners and patrons. Subscribing ensures uninterrupted access to our archives, special reports, and exclusive notices.

    LP is free thanks to our Sponsors

    Privacy Overview

    Privacy & Cookie Notice

    This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to help us understand how our content is accessed and used. Cookies are small text files stored in your browser that allow us to recognise your device upon return, retain your preferences, and gather anonymised usage statistics to improve site performance.

    Under EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we process this data based on your consent. You will be prompted to accept or customise your cookie preferences when you first visit our site.

    You may adjust or withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie settings link in the website footer. For more information on how we handle your data, please refer to our full Privacy Policy