Saturday, 31 January, 2026
London, UK
Saturday, January 31, 2026 9:37 PM
broken clouds 7.8°C
Condition: Broken clouds
Humidity: 86%
Wind Speed: 9.6 km/h

Keir Starmer says Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor should think of victims and give evidence on Jeffrey Epstein to Congress

Sir Keir Starmer has renewed his calls for Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor to testify to Congress about what he knew about the convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

The Prime Minister was pressed on new revelations in the Epstein files about the former prince by reporters as he flew back from a four-day trip to the Far East, visiting China and Japan to meet their leaders.

Asked if it was now time for Mr Mountbatten-Windsor to apologise to the victims of Epstein for his association with the disgraced paedophile and testify before Congress in the US about what he knew, the Prime Minister said: “I have always approached this question with the victims of Epstein in kind.

“Epstein’s victims have to be the first priority. As for whether there should be an apology, that’s a matter for Andrew.

“But, yes, in terms of testifying, I have always said anybody who has got information should be prepared to share that information in whatever form they are asked to do that.

“You can’t be victim-centred if you’re not prepared to do that.”

Mr Mountbatten-Windsor has consistently denied any wrongdoing and being named in the documents does not suggest any misconduct.

It emerged in the cache of documents released by the US Department of Justice that Epstein had also sent £10,000 to Lord Mandelson’s husband, Reinaldo Avila da Silva, when he was a Labour Minister in Gordon Brown’s Government.

The Prime Minister was pressed on new revelations in the Epstein files about the former prince by reporters as he flew back from a four-day trip to the Far East

In September 2009, the paedophile financier reportedly sent thousands to Mr da Silva to cover osteopathy course fees.

Asked whether the £10,000 payment to Lord Mandelson’s spouse at a time when he was a Labour Business Secretary fell short of the standards he would expect for a peer or the realm, the Prime Minister declined to be drawn.

He said: “In relation to Peter Mandelson, obviously, he was removed as ambassador in relation to the further information that came to light in September of last year.

“I’ve nothing more to say in relation to Peter Mandelson.”

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Jeffrey Epstein

Responding to the revelations, Lord Mandelson said in a statement: “I was wrong to believe Epstein following his conviction and to continue my association with him afterwards.

“I apologise unequivocally for doing so to the women and girls who suffered.

“I was never culpable or complicit in his crimes.

“Like everyone else, I learned the actual truth about him after his death.

Lord Mandelson and Keir Starmer

“But his victims did know what he was doing, their voices were not heard and I am sorry I was amongst those who believed him over them.”

However, MPs have put pressure on Mr Mountbatten-Windsor to discuss
The Liberal Democrats forced a debate on the 65-year-old’s connections to Epstein in November.

Democrat lawmakers also wrote to Mr Mountbatten-Windsor on November 6 to ask him to sit for a transcribed interview.

The letter, signed by 16 members of the US House Oversight Committee, set a response deadline of November 20.

Jeffrey Epstein

The former Duke of York missed the deadline to cooperate voluntarily.
Documents released by the US Department of Justice this week appeared to show Andrew on all fours over a woman.

The photo showed a man, believed to be the former prince, looking at the camera while a woman was lying on her back between his arms.

An email exchange also appeared to show the duke and Epstein discussing a “friend who I think you might enjoy having dinner with”.

The pair also disclosed dates she would be in London, the documents appear to show.


LP Staff Writers

Writers at Lord’s Press come from a range of professional backgrounds, including history, diplomacy, heraldry, and public administration. Many publish anonymously or under initials—a practice that reflects the publication’s long-standing emphasis on discretion and editorial objectivity. While they bring expertise in European nobility, protocol, and archival research, their role is not to opine, but to document. Their focus remains on accuracy, historical integrity, and the preservation of events and individuals whose significance might otherwise go unrecorded.

Categories

Follow

    Newsletter

    Subscribe to receive your complimentary login credentials and unlock full access to all features and stories from Lord’s Press.

    As a journal of record, Lord’s Press remains freely accessible—thanks to the enduring support of our distinguished partners and patrons. Subscribing ensures uninterrupted access to our archives, special reports, and exclusive notices.

    LP is free thanks to our Sponsors

    Privacy Overview

    Privacy & Cookie Notice

    This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to help us understand how our content is accessed and used. Cookies are small text files stored in your browser that allow us to recognise your device upon return, retain your preferences, and gather anonymised usage statistics to improve site performance.

    Under EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we process this data based on your consent. You will be prompted to accept or customise your cookie preferences when you first visit our site.

    You may adjust or withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie settings link in the website footer. For more information on how we handle your data, please refer to our full Privacy Policy