Sunday, 21 December, 2025
London, UK
Sunday, December 21, 2025 9:29 AM
broken clouds 9.3°C
Condition: Broken clouds
Humidity: 95%
Wind Speed: 7.4 km/h

Rachel Reeves refuses to rule out MORE tax rises next year after £26billion Budget raid

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has refused to rule out further tax rises in 2026, despite hitting taxpayers with £26billion of increases in last month’s Budget.

Speaking to The i Paper, the Chancellor expressed hope that “further changes to taxes are less necessary” owing to the expanded fiscal buffer created by her November Budget.

“What I did do in the Budget a couple of weeks ago was increase the fiscal headroom that the government has, more than doubled that, which means that when further disruption and shocks come our way we’re better able to withstand those sorts of shocks,” she explained.

Ms Reeves maintained it would be inappropriate to begin drafting subsequent budgets mere weeks after delivering her most recent financial statement, particularly given the “incredibly volatile” global economic climate.

Rachel Reeves

The Budget saw Ms Reeves implement £26billion in tax increases, including an extension of the freeze on income tax thresholds.

This latest round of rises follows a £40billion package announced in her first Budget, bringing the cumulative total to approximately £66billion in tax hikes since Labour took office.

The Chancellor and Sir Keir Starmer have been accused of breaking manifesto commitments not to raise income tax, National Insurance or VAT on working people.

The combined effect of these measures has pushed Britain’s tax burden to its highest point since the Second World War, with growing numbers of workers being pulled into higher tax brackets.

Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves

Ms Reeves had previously described her initial Budget increases as a “once in a generation” event.

She told the Confederation of British Industry in November 2024 that the government would not need to “come back for more.”

The Chancellor has faced accusations of breaching Labour’s election promises by extending the income tax threshold freeze, a measure that effectively drags more workers into paying higher rates of tax.

Ms Reeves has defended herself against these claims, arguing that the manifesto commitment “referred to the rates of income tax and National Insurance and the rate of VAT” rather than thresholds.

RACHEL REEVES – READ THE LATEST: 

Rachel Reeves

However, this position appears to contradict her own statements from the previous Budget, when she declared: “I have come to the conclusion that extending the threshold freeze would hurt working people. It would take more money out of their payslips.”

At that time, she explicitly stated: “I am keeping every single promise on tax that I made in our manifesto, so there will be no extension of the freeze in income tax and national insurance thresholds.”

Turning to housing policy, Ms Reeves identified helping young people onto the property ladder as a Government priority, noting that keeping interest rates low remains essential to this goal.

“There has been a decline in home ownership over the last 10 or 15 years,” she said.

“I want to move in the other direction and find more people being able to get a mortgage and get on the housing ladder, because I know that that is the aspiration for so many people.”

The Chancellor expressed support for proposals under consideration by the Financial Conduct Authority that would introduce more flexible mortgage arrangements, enabling first-time buyers to “borrow more and also borrow a bigger multiple of what your income is.”

Ms Reeves acknowledged that purchasing a home in her twenties, as she once did, would be impossible in today’s economic conditions.

It comes after the Chancellor was barred from her local pub amid backlash over tax hikes hitting the hospitality industry.

Our Standards: The GB News Editorial Charter

LP Staff Writers

Writers at Lord’s Press come from a range of professional backgrounds, including history, diplomacy, heraldry, and public administration. Many publish anonymously or under initials—a practice that reflects the publication’s long-standing emphasis on discretion and editorial objectivity. While they bring expertise in European nobility, protocol, and archival research, their role is not to opine, but to document. Their focus remains on accuracy, historical integrity, and the preservation of events and individuals whose significance might otherwise go unrecorded.

Categories

Follow

    Newsletter

    Subscribe to receive your complimentary login credentials and unlock full access to all features and stories from Lord’s Press.

    As a journal of record, Lord’s Press remains freely accessible—thanks to the enduring support of our distinguished partners and patrons. Subscribing ensures uninterrupted access to our archives, special reports, and exclusive notices.

    LP is free thanks to our Sponsors

    Privacy Overview

    Privacy & Cookie Notice

    This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to help us understand how our content is accessed and used. Cookies are small text files stored in your browser that allow us to recognise your device upon return, retain your preferences, and gather anonymised usage statistics to improve site performance.

    Under EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we process this data based on your consent. You will be prompted to accept or customise your cookie preferences when you first visit our site.

    You may adjust or withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie settings link in the website footer. For more information on how we handle your data, please refer to our full Privacy Policy