Thursday, 23 October, 2025
London, UK
Thursday, October 23, 2025 8:18 PM
scattered clouds 8.5°C
Condition: Scattered clouds
Humidity: 76%
Wind Speed: 31.5 km/h

Socialist critic of NATO and EU poised to win Ireland’s presidency

DUBLIN — She’s slammed NATO, voted against EU treaties, been accused of offering propaganda boosts for dictators from Russia to Syria — and now she’s on track to become Ireland’s next president.

Catherine Connolly, a former mayor of the western city of Galway who’s spent the past nine years as an opposition socialist lawmaker in Ireland’s parliament, has built a commanding polling lead ahead of Friday’s election versus her only challenger, former government minister Heather Humphreys from the center-ground Fine Gael party.

The latest opinion poll, published Wednesday night, put Connolly on 55.7 percent support compared to Humphreys’ 31.6 percent. Results will be announced Saturday, but the surprisingly fleet-footed 68-year-old Connolly acts and talks like she’s already won.

A Connolly victory shouldn’t be a surprise, given how Ireland’s presidency has evolved in the public mind since civil rights lawyer Mary Robinson’s trailblazing win in 1990.

Once a sinecure for senior statesmen backed by the dominant Fianna Fáil party, Robinson’s breakthrough augured in a new era of presidents coming from the opposition benches or outside political ranks. That reflects many voters’ apparent preference today for a presidency — a largely ceremonial post with no role in day-to-day government — that can challenge the establishment and, more specifically, the current Fianna Fáil-led coalition.

Should she win, Connolly will succeed another Galway socialist, Michael D. Higgins, who spent the past two terms and 14 years expanding what the president is allowed to say and do.

Unapologetically outspoken

Like Higgins, Connolly has been outspoken in condemning Israel for its two-year war in Gaza — a certain vote-winner in a country that openly sympathizes with the Palestinians and has wretched relations with Tel Aviv.

But Connolly has gone farther, defending Hamas’ right to play a future role in any Palestinian state. That drew rebukes from Prime Minister Micheál Martin, the leader of Fianna Fáil, and Foreign Minister Simon Harris, leader of Fine Gael, the other party in Ireland’s center-right government.

It’s her NATO-critical stance on Ukraine, and opposition to wider European security moves, that could soon be generating the most awkward headlines for an Irish government caught between the state’s official neutrality and its support for EU efforts to bolster Ukraine.

Connolly faced questioning from supporters at one campaign event in a Dublin pub after she compared Germany’s current plans to boost defense spending with Nazi militarization in the 1930s. But she’s stood firm in her opposition to the EU’s ReArm Europe plans to boost defense spending by €800 billion.

At the final televised presidential debate Tuesday night, Connolly was asked how she would treat a visiting U.S. President Donald Trump — and whether she would challenge him to his face about U.S. backing of Israel and its Gaza war.

“Genocide was enabled and resourced by American money,” Connolly began, before being asked again if she would say this to Trump, who has a golf resort in Ireland and plans to visit when it hosts the Irish Open next year.

“If it’s just a meet and greet, then I will meet and greet. If the discussion is genocide, then that’s a completely different thing,” she said.

Unifying the opposition

Connolly’s dominance in the campaign has been delivered, in part, by her ability to win backing from all of the opposition parties on Ireland’s normally fractious left wing — most crucially the nationalist Sinn Féin, which declined to run its own candidate. Instead, Sinn Féin chief Mary Lou McDonald and the party’s leader of the government in neighboring Northern Ireland, First Minister Michelle O’Neill, have joined Connolly on the campaign trail.

Conspicuous in their absence have been Connolly’s previous highest-profile allies, socialist radicals Mick Wallace and Clare Daly — dubbed Moscow Mick and Kremlin Clare by their political opponents.

Connolly in 2018 joined Daly and Wallace in a tour of government-controlled parts of Syria back when all three were opposition lawmakers in the Irish parliament. Daly and Wallace subsequently were elected MEPs, but lost their Brussels seats in the 2024 European Parliament election.

In media interviews and televised debates, Connolly has repeatedly batted away questions about the wisdom of taking that one-sided tour of Syria in areas under the control of President Bashar al-Assad, who was deposed by rebels last year. She has dismissed media questions about her links with Daly and Wallace as attempts at “guilt by association.”

Speaking for Ireland

Veterans of Ireland’s diplomatic service have expressed fears that a President Connolly might confuse the world about the Irish government’s true positions. They stress Ireland’s economic dependence on hundreds of U.S. multinationals and the EU’s strong support for Ireland following the U.K.’s disruptive exit.

Bobby McDonagh, a former Irish ambassador to the U.K. and EU, says Connolly “has made statements and taken stances that, in my strong view and the view of many, are essentially anti-EU.”

He called Connolly’s criticisms of increased German defense spending in the face of rising Russian security threats “fatuous” and her comments suggesting a parallel to Nazi-era militarization “absurd.”

McDonagh said that, while “the pro-European majority in this country and the government can simply ignore her,” positions taken by a President Connolly would “register internationally and would have the capacity to damage Ireland’s reputation and interests.”

LP Staff Writers

Writers at Lord’s Press come from a range of professional backgrounds, including history, diplomacy, heraldry, and public administration. Many publish anonymously or under initials—a practice that reflects the publication’s long-standing emphasis on discretion and editorial objectivity. While they bring expertise in European nobility, protocol, and archival research, their role is not to opine, but to document. Their focus remains on accuracy, historical integrity, and the preservation of events and individuals whose significance might otherwise go unrecorded.

Categories

Follow

    Newsletter

    Subscribe to receive your complimentary login credentials and unlock full access to all features and stories from Lord’s Press.

    As a journal of record, Lord’s Press remains freely accessible—thanks to the enduring support of our distinguished partners and patrons. Subscribing ensures uninterrupted access to our archives, special reports, and exclusive notices.

    LP is free thanks to our Sponsors

    Privacy Overview

    Privacy & Cookie Notice

    This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to help us understand how our content is accessed and used. Cookies are small text files stored in your browser that allow us to recognise your device upon return, retain your preferences, and gather anonymised usage statistics to improve site performance.

    Under EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we process this data based on your consent. You will be prompted to accept or customise your cookie preferences when you first visit our site.

    You may adjust or withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie settings link in the website footer. For more information on how we handle your data, please refer to our full Privacy Policy