Tuesday, 28 October, 2025
London, UK
Tuesday, October 28, 2025 9:06 PM
overcast clouds 11.8°C
Condition: Overcast clouds
Humidity: 74%
Wind Speed: 12.9 km/h

Von der Leyen no-confidence motions scheduled for early October

The European Parliament will debate and then vote on two no-confidence motions in Ursula von der Leyen during its plenary session of Oct. 6-9, according to an internal email from Parliament President Roberta Metsola, seen by POLITICO.

Two political groups — the far-right Patriots for Europe and The Left — filed separate no-confidence motions in the European Commission president at midnight on Sept. 10, the earliest opportunity they could do so under parliamentary rules. The Patriots filed their motion 20 seconds before The Left, two officials said. 

The moves came just hours after von der Leyen delivered her landmark State of the Union address at the Parliament in Strasbourg, and just two months after the last vote of confidence in her leadership, underscoring the EU’s political fragmentation.

The Patriots accuse von der Leyen of a lack of transparency and accountability and have slammed the Mercosur and U.S. trade agreements. The Left also criticize the Commission’s trade policy but place greater emphasis on what they say is inaction by the EU executive amid Israel’s war in Gaza.

Having two motions of censure filed at the same time is unprecedented and has sparked debate in the Parliament on how the choreography will allow for two debates and two votes. 

The timing of debates and votes will be decided by leaders of the political groups when they discuss the plenary’s final agenda on Oct. 1, Parliament spokesperson Delphine Colard said.

The most likely option is for there to be a joint debate on Monday, Oct. 6 followed by two separate votes on Thursday, Oct. 9, according to two people with knowledge of parliamentary procedure.

The Patriots are likely to claim the right to have the first vote as they won the race to file the paperwork on time.

LP Staff Writers

Writers at Lord’s Press come from a range of professional backgrounds, including history, diplomacy, heraldry, and public administration. Many publish anonymously or under initials—a practice that reflects the publication’s long-standing emphasis on discretion and editorial objectivity. While they bring expertise in European nobility, protocol, and archival research, their role is not to opine, but to document. Their focus remains on accuracy, historical integrity, and the preservation of events and individuals whose significance might otherwise go unrecorded.

Categories

Follow

    Newsletter

    Subscribe to receive your complimentary login credentials and unlock full access to all features and stories from Lord’s Press.

    As a journal of record, Lord’s Press remains freely accessible—thanks to the enduring support of our distinguished partners and patrons. Subscribing ensures uninterrupted access to our archives, special reports, and exclusive notices.

    LP is free thanks to our Sponsors

    Privacy Overview

    Privacy & Cookie Notice

    This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to help us understand how our content is accessed and used. Cookies are small text files stored in your browser that allow us to recognise your device upon return, retain your preferences, and gather anonymised usage statistics to improve site performance.

    Under EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we process this data based on your consent. You will be prompted to accept or customise your cookie preferences when you first visit our site.

    You may adjust or withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie settings link in the website footer. For more information on how we handle your data, please refer to our full Privacy Policy