Sunday, 09 November, 2025
London, UK
Sunday, November 9, 2025 9:47 PM
overcast clouds 13.3°C
Condition: Overcast clouds
Humidity: 85%
Wind Speed: 17.7 km/h

Meghan Markle and Princess Kate both cried “their eyes out,” book says

https://d.newsweek.com/en/full/2643443/princess-kate-meghan-markle.webp?w=1600&h=900&q=88&f=7d958ccd8e38dd36dc3cace1aa128ee3

Meghan Markle and Princess Kate were both “crying their eyes out” after an argument about bridesmaids’ dresses, according to a royal biography that differs from Meghan’s own account.

The Duchess of Sussex told Oprah Winfrey in 2021 that a major turning point in coverage of her by the British press came with an article suggesting she had made Kate cry.

In fact, Meghan argued, the reverse was true and Kate had made her cry and apologized later with a bunch of flowers.

Princess Kate and Meghan Markle
Princess Kate, left, and Meghan Markle watch Trooping the Colour from the balcony of Buckingham Palace in London on June 9, 2018, two months after a dispute over bridesmaids’ dresses.
Princess Kate, left, and Meghan Markle watch Trooping the Colour from the balcony of Buckingham Palace in London on June 9, 2018, two months after a dispute over bridesmaids’ dresses.
Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images

Now a new biography, Yes, Ma’am: The Secret Life of Royal Servants, by Tom Quinn, has offered an alternative perspective on the incident. It has not been confirmed by either side.

A royal staff member was quoted in the book saying: “I can tell you that all the papers and commentators got this wrong, the truth is that as with many of these spats between sisters, brothers or even sisters-in-law, both sides were really upset.”

“The truth is that during the discussions about the bridesmaid’s dress Meghan said a few things she regretted and Kate said a few things she later regretted, but it was all in the heat of the moment,” the staff member continued. “Both women were crying their eyes out!”

Meghan Markle’s Account to Oprah Winfrey

The account directly contradicts Meghan’s version to Winfrey, in which she said Kate had later apologized: “The reverse happened. And I don’t say that to be disparaging to anyone, because it was a really hard week of the wedding.

“And she was upset about something, but she owned it, and she apologized. And she brought me flowers and a note, apologizing. And she did what I would do if I knew that I hurt someone, right, to just take accountability for it.”

“A few days before the wedding,” Meghan continued, “she was upset about something pertaining—yes, the issue was correct—about flower-girl dresses, and it made me cry, and it really hurt my feelings.”

Prince Harry’s Account in Spare

Harry went into more detail, suggesting Kate had called Meghan days before the wedding to say Princess “Charlotte’s dress is too big, too long, too baggy. She cried when she tried it on at home.”

According to Harry, Meghan replied: “Right, and I told you the tailor has been standing by since 8 a.m. Here. At KP [Kensington Palace]. Can you take Charlotte to have it altered, as the other moms are doing?”

“No, all the dresses need to be remade,” Kate said.

Harry wrote: “Her own wedding dress designer agreed, Kate added. Meg asked if Kate was aware of what was going on right now. With her father.

“Kate said she was well aware, but the dresses. ‘And the wedding is in four
days!'”

“A short time later I arrived home and found Meg on the floor. Sobbing,” he continued.

“I was horrified to see her so upset, but I didn’t think it a catastrophe. Emotions were running high, of course, after the stress of the last week, the last month, the last day. It was intolerable—but temporary. Kate hadn’t meant any harm, I told her.”

Later in the book, he described Harry and Meghan meeting Prince William and Kate to discuss press coverage that accused Meghan of making Kate cry: “Kate got things rolling straightaway by acknowledging that these stories in the papers about Meg making her cry were totally false. ‘I know, Meghan, that I was the one who made you cry.’

“I sighed. Excellent start, I thought. Meg appreciated the apology, but wanted to know why the papers had said this, and what was being done to correct them?”

‘A Storm in a Teacup’

The staff member quoted in the new biography told Quinn the whole saga had been blown out of proportion in the media: “Whenever this sort of thing happens in the royal family, traditionally no one says anything publicly about it so it rarely reaches the media, but on this occasion all sorts of other grievances meant that what was really nothing but a storm in a teacup reached the media and became a big issue.

“The other thing people forget is that when a private royal argument or row reaches the media, it gets subtly altered and usually made more significant than it really is.

“But even the royals tend to believe what they read in the newspapers if it suits them, so the incident with the bridesmaid’s dress became a kind of marker for all the other problems that Meghan had with Kate and with William and other members of the family.”

Jack Royston is chief royal correspondent for Newsweek, based in London. You can find him on X, formerly Twitter, at @jack_royston and read his stories on Newsweek’s The Royals Facebook page.

Do you have a question about King Charles III and Queen Camilla, William and Kate, Meghan and Harry, or their family that you would like our experienced royal correspondents to answer? Email royals@newsweek.com. We’d love to hear from you.

LP Staff Writers

Writers at Lord’s Press come from a range of professional backgrounds, including history, diplomacy, heraldry, and public administration. Many publish anonymously or under initials—a practice that reflects the publication’s long-standing emphasis on discretion and editorial objectivity. While they bring expertise in European nobility, protocol, and archival research, their role is not to opine, but to document. Their focus remains on accuracy, historical integrity, and the preservation of events and individuals whose significance might otherwise go unrecorded.

Categories

Follow

    Newsletter

    Subscribe to receive your complimentary login credentials and unlock full access to all features and stories from Lord’s Press.

    As a journal of record, Lord’s Press remains freely accessible—thanks to the enduring support of our distinguished partners and patrons. Subscribing ensures uninterrupted access to our archives, special reports, and exclusive notices.

    LP is free thanks to our Sponsors

    Privacy Overview

    Privacy & Cookie Notice

    This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to help us understand how our content is accessed and used. Cookies are small text files stored in your browser that allow us to recognise your device upon return, retain your preferences, and gather anonymised usage statistics to improve site performance.

    Under EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we process this data based on your consent. You will be prompted to accept or customise your cookie preferences when you first visit our site.

    You may adjust or withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie settings link in the website footer. For more information on how we handle your data, please refer to our full Privacy Policy